CO129-452 - Others & Individuals - 1918 — Page 421

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

##

the Attorney-General, where he has the right of audience in the Courts not because he is Attorney-General but because he is a Barrister, where he has the right of precedence because he is the Barrister who holds the appointment of Attorney-General. In England it is inconceivable that a layman should ever be appointed Attorney-General. I am advised that any Judge would refuse him the right of audience.

If his Lordship was afforded Attorney-General in H.K. as appeared in Comet, the Judge would doubt consider it his duty to take over the duties were confined to those of an advisory character, state drafting of Ordinances. Surely it cannot be that there is approval of the appointment of a layman to act as Attorney-General in the absence of legislation. The difficulty will still occur if a layman is appointed to perform any duty of the Attorney-General out of Court with regard to a matter which would come before the Court, e.g., during committal proceedings before the Court, to certain prosecutions.

It seems, therefore, to be advisable for local legislation to sanction the appointment of a layman to act as Attorney-General, which might easily cause a sensation if the Acting Attorney-General being denied recognition in the Courts. I am of the opinion that local legislation should cover the appointment of a layman to act as Attorney-General with some provision.

Edit History

2026-06-26 10:44:52 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
##the Attorney-General, where he has the right of audience in the Courts not because he is Attorney-General but because he is a Barrister, where he has the right of precedence because he is the Barrister who holds the appointment of Attorney-General. In England it is inconceivable that a layman should ever be appointed Attorney-General. I am advised that any Judge would refuse him the right of audience.If his Lordship was afforded Attorney-General in H.K. as appeared in Comet, the Judge would doubt consider it his duty to take over the duties were confined to those of an advisory character, state drafting of Ordinances. Surely it cannot be that there is approval of the appointment of a layman to act as Attorney-General in the absence of legislation. The difficulty will still occur if a layman is appointed to perform any duty of the Attorney-General out of Court with regard to a matter which would come before the Court, e.g., during committal proceedings before the Court, to certain prosecutions.It seems, therefore, to be advisable for local legislation to sanction the appointment of a layman to act as Attorney-General, which might easily cause a sensation if the Acting Attorney-General being denied recognition in the Courts. I am of the opinion that local legislation should cover the appointment of a layman to act as Attorney-General with some provision.
Baseline (Original)
the d, where he has the ought of audience in the Counts not locarse he is Attorney- feneral but becaux le is a Carrister, where he has the right of precadence because he is the barrister who holds the aufforiment of Attorney-General. Ininconceivable England it is with that a layman should ever be afforinded Cettings General,Lif he I am advised that any Judge would refuse him the might of audience.If his Dood a car Nishet afforded Attorney-General in H.K.2& ad as appeared in Comet,Comet, the Goodger worldAno doubt consider it his duty to take هاor theNight duties wereAnd even of de Goodafforted confined to those of aiDummies Surely Comed that therese approve appointment of a layman act as امهat fenfer the absencelegislationpurely advisory character state drafting1417 of Ordinances, ator, the difficulty wiltthe Court might still occur if lafurfarted to perform any dutiny of the Cultorney-Seneral out of Count with regard to mantter which would comea-.g. guring comment before the Count to certain prosecutions.It seem3. D therefore, to be Atit Anda beradable for to sanationrealt i malcoursetherefore, which might easily fumblin sensation would be caused by the Acting Attorney-General being denied recogintionAttorney- feneral in Dave of ofimion that Lee Courts. AdJarm should cover*r the affortment of a logon to act lovea) Attorney-General with some ALocallegislation
2026-06-26 10:44:52 · Baseline
View content

the

d, where he has the

ought of audience in the Counts not locarse

he is Attorney- feneral but becaux le is a

Carrister, where he has the right of precadence

because he is the barrister who holds the

aufforiment of Attorney-General. In

inconceivable

England it is with that a layman

should ever be afforinded Cettings General,

Lif he

I am

advised that any Judge

would refuse him the might of audience.

If his Dood a car Nishet afforded

Attorney-General in H.K. 2

& ad as appeared in Comet,

Comet, the Goodger world

Ano

doubt consider it his duty to take

ها

or the Night

duties were

And even of de Good

afforted

confined to those of ai

Dummies

Surely

Comed that therese approve

appointment of a layman

act as

امه

at fenfer the absence

legislation

purely advisory character state drafting

1

417

of Ordinances, ator, the difficulty wilt

the Court might still occur

if la

furfarted to perform any dutiny of the

Cultorney-Seneral out of Count with

regard to

mantter which would come

a

-.g. guring comment

before the Count to certain prosecutions.

It seem

3. D therefore, to be

Atit Anda beradable for

to sanation

realt i mal

course

therefore,

which might easily

fumblin sensation

would be caused by the Acting

Attorney-General being denied recogintion

Attorney- feneral in

Dave of ofimion that

Lee Courts. Ad

Jarm

should cover

*r

the affortment of a logon to act lovea) Attorney-General with some

A

Local

legislation

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.